Objective To apply World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) as a tool to assess the functioning of the old patients after stroke. Methods From August, 2018 to February, 2019, 107 old inpatients with stroke were divided into four groups according to the course of disease: ≤ 6 months, 7-12 months, 13-18 months and 19-24 months. They were assessed with WHODAS 2.0 and modified Barthel Index (MBI) at admission and discharge. Results The scores of both MBI and total WHODAS 2.0 improved at discharge (t > 2.481, P < 0.001). WHODAS 2.0 total scores decreased with the course of disease (F = 3.444, P < 0.05), but no significant decrease was found in the domains of Getting Along, Life Activities and Participation (F < 2.410, P > 0.05). WHODAS 2.0 total scores negatively correlated with MBI score (r = -0.540, P < 0.001), except the scores of domains of Life Activities and Participation (r = 0.184, P > 0.05). Conclusion WHODAS 2.0 can be used as a tool to assess and follow up the function and disability of old stroke patients.
BAI Li-ming
,
LI Xin-ping
,
QIU Zhuo-ying
,
ZHANG Ming-sheng
,
MA Hong-zhuo
,
LI An-qiao
. Evaluation of Functioning for Aging Patients with Stroke Using World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2019
, 25(9)
: 1000
-1003
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.09.002
1 LevasseurM, RichardL, GauvinL, et al. Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: proposed taxonomy of social activities [J]. Soc Sci Med, 2010, 71: 2141-2149.
2 Ćwirlej-SozańskaA, Wilmowska-PietruszyńskaA, Wiśniowska-SzurlejA, et al. Analysis of health, functioning and disability of rural inhabitants aged 60-80 living in south-eastern Poland － a cross sectional study [J]. Ann Agric Environ Med, 2017, 25(3): 388-394.
3 NichollsE, LehanT, PlazaS L, et al. Factors influencing acceptance of disability in individuals with spinal cord injury in Neiva, Colombia, South America [J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2012, 34(13): 1082-1088.
4 邱卓英,陈迪,祝捷. 构建基于ICF的功能和残疾评定的理论和方法[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2010, 16(7): 675-677.
5 FedericiS, BracalentiM, MeloniF, et al. World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: an international systematic review [J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2017, 39(23): 2347-2380.
6 KwonS Y, HongS E, KimE J, et al. Monitoring of functioning status in subjects with chronic stroke in South Korea using WHODAS II [J]. Ann Rehabil Med, 2016, 40(1): 111-119.
7 DhamoonM S, MoonY P, PaikM C, et al. Trajectory of functional decline before and after ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhattan Study [J]. Stroke, 2012, 43(8): 2180-2184.
8 DonkelS J, BenaddiB, DippelD W J, et al. Prognostic hemostasis biomarkers in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review [J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 2019, 39(3): 360-372.
9 PettersenR, DahlT, WyllerT B. Prediction of long-term functional outcome after stroke rehabilitation [J]. Clin Rehabil, 2002, 16(2): 149-159.
10 GalliT, MirataP, FogliaE, et al. A comparison between WHODAS 2.0 and Modified Barthel Index: which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the recovery rate in orthopedic rehabilitation? [J]. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res, 2018, 10: 301-307.
11 熊德凤,张冠庭,潘经光,等. 运用世界卫生组织《残疾评定量表》(WHODAS 2.0)评定香港残疾人士和慢性病患者的活动和参与障碍[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2014, 20(6): 508-512.
12 LeeD, HeffronJ L, MirzaM. Content and effectiveness of interventions focusing on community participation after stroke: a systematic review [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.06.008. [Epub ahead of print].
13 邱卓英,郭键勋,杨剑,等. 康复2030:促进实现《联合国2030年可持续发展议程》相关目标[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(4): 373-378.
