Objective To explore the related factors affecting the functional outcome of adult spinal cord injury and to establish a predictive model. Methods A retrospective analysis was made on the medical records of 110 adult spinal cord injured patients with paraplegia from September, 2016 to December, 2018. Quantitative indicators that affected functional outcome were systematically collected, including age, length of stay, number of other diagnostic, number of complications, number of comorbidities, number of operations, days from onset to rehabilitation intervention, and the total scores of Lower Extremity Motor Subscore (LEMS), light touch (LT), pin prick (PP) and modified Barthel Index (MBI) at admission (MBIa) and discharge (MBId), the change values and change rates of MBI were calculated. The correlation coefficients among variables were analyzed. Multivariate linear regression models were established for the MBI total score at discharge and change of MBI score from admission to discharge (MBIc). Results MBId was significantly correlated with MBIa, the total score of LEMS at admission (LEMSa), the total score of PP at admission, the total score of LT at admission, the number of days from onset to rehabilitation intervention, the number of operations and the number of comorbidities. The fitted regression equation was: MBId = 28.24 + 0.52 × MBIa + 0.24 × LEMSa - 1.23 × number of comorbidities (R2 = 0.64, P < 0.001). The MBIc was significantly correlated with MBIa, the days from onset to rehabilitation intervention and the length of stay. The fitted regression equation was: MBIc = 18.44 - 0.29 × MBIa + 0.06 × length of stay (R2 = 0.29, P < 0.001). Conclusion The spinal cord injured patients with better functional status, higher motor score and less comorbidity at admission, and longer hospitalization have better functional recovery.
CUI Yao
,
CONG Fang
,
LI Jian-jun
,
GAO Feng
,
DU Liang-jie
,
YANG Ming-liang
. Predictive Model for Functional Outcome of Adult Spinal Cord Injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2019
, 25(10)
: 1125
-1132
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.10.003
1 李建军. 脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准参考手册[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2008.
2 美国脊髓损伤协会，国际脊髓损伤学会. 脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(2011 年修订)[J]. 李建军，王方永,译.中国康复理论与实践, 2011, 17(10): 963-972.
3 李建军,杨明亮,杨德刚,等. “创伤性脊柱脊髓损伤评估、治疗与康复”专家共识[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2017, 23(3): 274-287.
4 梁志,赵超男,董云英,等. 脊髓损伤康复结局研究进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2003, 9(4): 239-240.
5 吴军发,吴毅,胡永善,等. 脊髓损伤患者康复治疗的疗效观察[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2005, 20(5): 358-359.
6 李丽,白玉龙,吴毅,等. 影响脊髓损伤患者出院时日常生活活动能力的相关因素分析[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2010, 32(6): 442-445.
7 WilsonJ R, GrossmanR G, FrankowskiR F, et al. A clinical prediction model for long-term functional outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury based on acute clinical and imaging factors [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2012, 29(13): 2263-2271.
8 ScivolettoG, MorgantiB, DitunnoP, et al. Effects on age on spinal cord lesion patients' rehabilitation [J]. Spinal Cord, 2003, 41(8): 457-464.
9 McKinleyW, MeadeM A, KirshblumS, et al. Outcomes of early surgical management versus late or no surgical intervention after acute spinal cord injury [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2004, 85(11): 1818-1825.
10 PostM W M, DallmeijerA J, AngenotE L D, et al. Duration and functional outcome of spinal cord injury rehabilitation in the Netherlands [J]. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2004, 42(3): 75-85.
11 NewP W. Functional outcomes and disability after nontraumatic spinal cord injury rehabilitation: results from a retrospective study [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2005, 86(2): 250-261.
12 MckinleyW, SinhaA, KetchumJ, et al. Comparison of rehabilitation outcomes following vascular-related and traumatic spinal cord injury [J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2011, 34(4): 410-415.
13 ScivolettoG, FarchiS, LaurenzaL, et al. Traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord lesions: an Italian comparison of neurological and functional outcomes [J]. Spinal Cord, 2011, 49(3): 391-396.
14 ScivolettoG, FarchiS, LaurenzaL, et al. Impact of multiple injuries on functional and neurological outcomes of patients with spinal cord injury [J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2013, 21(1): 42.
15 马斌荣. 医学科研中的统计方法[M]. 4版. 北京:科学出版社, 2012.
16 梁志,赵超男,董云英. 脑卒中康复结局预测的临床研究[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2002, 8(10): 577-599.
17 罗伯特·卡巴科弗. R语言实战(第2版) [M]. 北京:人民邮电出版社, 2016.
18 张铁军,陈兴林,刘振球. R语言与医学统计图形[M]. 北京:人民卫生出版社, 2018.
19 KimH S, JeongH J, KimM O. Changes of functional outcomes according to the degree of completeness of spinal cord injury [J]. Ann Rehabil Med, 2014, 38(3): 335-341.
20 GunesS, AytürY K, G?kH, et al. Demographic and clinical profile and functional outcomes of patients with spinal cord injury after rehabilitation [J]. Turk J Phys Med Rehab, 2017, 63(1): 66-71.
21 ZhangJ L, ChenJ, WuM, et al. Several time indicators and Barthel index relationships at different spinal cord injury levels [J]. Spinal Cord, 2015, 53(9): 679-681.
22 KayE, DeutschA, ChenD, et al. Effects of gender on inpatient rehabilitation outcomes inthe elderly with incomplete paraplegia from nontraumatic spinal cord injury [J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2010, 33(4): 379-386.
23 HallK M, CohenM E, WrightJ, et al. Characteristics of the Functional Independence Measure in traumatic spinal cord injury [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1999, 80(11): 1471-1476.
24 DijkersM. Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta analysis of the effects of disablement components [J]. Spinal Cord, 1999, 35(12): 829-840.
25 CurA, KeckM E, DietzV. Functional outcome following spinal cord injury significance of motor-evoked potentials and ASIA scores [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1998, 79(1): 81-86.
26 王于领,梁崎,黄东锋,等. 脊髓独立测量量表Ⅱ中文版的开发及信度和效度研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2007, 22(8): 714-717.
27 叶超群,孙天胜,李建军, 等. 脊髓独立性评定及其第3版介绍[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2007, 13(10): 921-923.
