Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice >
Effect of Dynamic or Static Hand Action Observation on Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia after Stroke
Received date: 2019-02-19
Revised date: 2019-05-23
Online published: 2020-02-07
Supported by
Beijing Natural Science Foundation(7162049)
Objective To compare the effects of observation to non-goal-oriented hand actions with video or pictures on speech recovery in stroke patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia.
Methods From January, 2016 to December, 2018, 30 patients with non-fluent aphasia after stroke were randomly divided into two groups. The control group (n = 15) repeated the verbs after watching picture, and the experimental group (n = 15) repeated the verbs after watching videos, for four weeks. They were assessed with Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) before treatment and every week after treatment.
Results Aphasia quotient (AQ) increased with time (F > 32.922, P < 0.001), but no significant difference was found between two groups at any time points ( t < 0.699, P > 0.05). The interactive effect between time and group was significant ( F = 6.398, P < 0.001), which suggested that AQ increased more in the experimental group than in the control group.
Conclusion For non-goal-oriented hand action observation, video observation maybe promote speech recovery in stroke patients with chronic non-fluent aphasia.
Chun-wei WU , Pei-jun GUI , Chen CHEN , Hui WU , Suo-gang WANG , Ying XIE . Effect of Dynamic or Static Hand Action Observation on Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia after Stroke[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2020 , 26(1) : 89 -92 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.01.016
| [1] | Shih T Y, Wu C Y, Lin K C, et al. Effects of action observation therapy and mirror therapy after stroke on rehabilitation outcomes and neural mechanisms by MEG: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2017, 18(1):459-476. |
| [2] | Furlanis G, Ridolfi M, Polverino P, et al. Early recovery of aphasia through thrombolysis: the significance of spontaneous speech[J]. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 2018, 27(7):1937-1948. |
| [3] | Tarrant M, Carter M, Dean S G, et al. Singing for people with aphasia (SPA): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of a group singing intervention to improve well-being[J]. BMJ Open, 2018, 8(9):e025167-e025179. |
| [4] | de Ridder I R, Dijkland S A, Scheele M, et al. Development and validation of the Dutch Stroke Score for predicting disability and functional outcome after ischemic stroke: a tool to support efficient discharge planning[J]. Eur Stroke J, 2018, 3(2):165-173. |
| [5] | Palmateer J, Pan J, Pandya A, et al. Ultrasonic vocalization in murine experimental stroke: a mechanistic model of aphasia[J]. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2016, 34(2):287-295. |
| [6] | Chen W, Ye Q, Ji X, et al. Mirror neuron system based therapy for aphasia rehabilitation[J]. Front Psychol, 2015, 6:1665-1676. |
| [7] | Looeiyan N, Kianfar F, Ghasisin L. The introduction of IMITATE-R and its comparison with the IMITATE treatment method in the naming ability of two Persian speaking aphasic patients[J]. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2018. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2018.1496940.[Epub ahead of print]. |
| [8] | Gili T, Fiori V, de Pasquale G, et al. Right sensory-motor functional networks subserve action observation therapy in aphasia[J]. Brain Imaging Behav, 2017, 11(5):1397-1411. |
| [9] | Ertelt D, Binkofski F. Action observation as a tool for neurorehabilitation to moderate motor deficits and aphasia following stroke[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2012, 7(26):2063-2074. |
| [10] | Cacioppo S, Juan E, Monteleone G. Predicting intentions of a familiar significant other beyond the mirror neuron system[J]. Front Behav Neurosci, 2017, 11:155-167. |
| [11] | Nilipour R, Pourshahbaz A, Ghoreyshi Z S. Reliability and validity of bedside version of Persian WAB (P-WAB-1)[J]. Basic Clin Neurosci, 2014, 5(4):253-258. |
| [12] | Rizzolatti G, Fadiga L, Gallese V, et al. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions[J]. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 1996, 3(2):131-141. |
| [13] | Maranesi M, Livi A, Bonini L. Spatial and viewpoint selectivity for others' observed actions in monkey ventral premotor mirror neurons[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7(1):8231-8238. |
| [14] | Hobson H M, Bishop D V. The interpretation of mu suppression as an index of mirror neuron activity: past, present and future[J]. R Soc Open Sci, 2017, 4(3):160662-160684. |
| [15] | Marangolo P, Caltagirone C. Options to enhance recovery from aphasia by means of non-invasive brain stimulation and action observation therapy[J]. Expert Rev Neurother, 2014, 14(1):75-91. |
| [16] | Arya K N, Pandian S. Inadvertent recovery in communication deficits following the upper limb mirror therapy in stroke: a case report[J]. J Bodyw Mov Ther, 2014, 18(4):566-568. |
| [17] | Biagi L, Cioni G, Fogassi L, et al. Action observation network in childhood: a comparative fMRI study with adults[J]. Dev Sci, 2016, 19(6):1075-1086. |
| [18] | 陈文莉, 夏扬, 杨玺, 等. 手动作观察训练对脑卒中失语症患者语言功能的影响[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2014, 29(2):141-144. |
| [19] | Chen W L, Ye Q, Zhang S C, et al. Aphasia rehabilitation based on mirror neuron theory: a randomized-block-design study of neuropsychology and functional magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Neural Regen Res, 2019, 14(6):1004-1012. |
| [20] | Isoda K, Sueyoshi K, Ikeda Y, et al. Effect of the hand-omitted tool motion on mu rhythm suppression[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2016, 10:266-273. |
| [21] | Riello M, Faria A V, Ficek B, et al. The role of language severity and education in explaining performance on object and action naming in primary progressive aphasia[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2018, 10:346-356. |
| [22] | Wilson S M, Lam D, Babiak M C, et al. Transient aphasias after left hemisphere resective surgery[J]. J Neurosurg, 2015, 123(3):581-593. |
| [23] | Sinanovic O, Mrkonjic Z, Zukic S, et al. Post-stroke language disorders[J]. Acta Clin Croat, 2011, 50(1):79-94. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
