CJRTP

Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice >

2020 , Vol. 26 >Issue 3: 350 - 354

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.03.017

Application of Embodied Cognition in Speech Therapy (review)

  • Jia-yu WANG ,
  • Zhuo-ming CHEN ,
  • Jing XU ,
  • Wen-wen CHENG
Expand
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510630, China

Received date: 2019-07-21

  Revised date: 2019-10-24

  Online published: 2020-04-01

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China(81372113);Key Research Bases for Humanities and Social Sciences in Universities (Major)(16JJD190003);Guangdong Science and Technology Basic Condition Resources Field Project(2018A030321015)

Fold

Abstract

Embodied cognition is an important research direction in current psycholinguistics. Perceptual symbols theory, indexical hypothesis, immersed experiencer framework, symbol interdependency hypothesis and mirror neuron system are important research achievements of embodied cognition in the field of language, which may light a way for the further development of speech therapy.

Key words： speech therapy; embodied cognition; perceptual symbol; mirror neuron; psycholinguistics; review

Cite this article

Jia-yu WANG , Zhuo-ming CHEN , Jing XU , Wen-wen CHENG . Application of Embodied Cognition in Speech Therapy (review)[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2020 , 26(3) : 350 -354 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.03.017

References

[1] 陈卓铭. 语言治疗学[M]. 3版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.
[2] 陈卓铭. 汉语语言心理加工与失语症评估[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2015, 30(11):1091-1094.
[3] 汪洁, 吴东宇, 袁英, 等. 失语症心理语言评价指导经颅直流电刺激靶向治疗感觉性失语症:1例报告[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2017, 32(1):102-105.
[4] Bryon E, McLaughlin D, Mark B J, et al. Embodied Cognition, Acting and Performance[M]. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.
[5] Ghio M, Tettamanti M. Grounding sentence processing in the sensory-motor system [M]// Hickok G, Small S L. Neurobiology of Language. San Diego, Academic Press, 2016: 647-657.
[6] 李其维. “认知革命”与“第二代认知科学”刍议[J]. 心理学报, 2008, 40(12):1306-1327.
[7] 叶浩生. 具身认知:认知心理学的新取向[J]. 心理科学进展, 2010, 18(5):705-710.
[8] Newen A, Bruin L D, Gallagher S. The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
[9] 叶浩生. 具身认知的原理与应用 [M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2017.
[10] Monaco E, Jost L B, Gygax P M, et al. Embodied semantics in a second language: critical review and clinical implications[J]. Front Hum Neurosci, 2019, 13:110.
[11] Barsalou L W. Perceptual symbol systems[J]. Behav Brain Sci, 1999, 22(4):577-660.
[12] Zwaan R A, Stanfield R A, Yaxley R H. Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects[J]. Psychol Sci, 2002, 13(2):168-171.
[13] Zhong C B, Leonardelli G J. Cold and lonely: does social exclusion literally feel cold?[J]. Psychol Sci, 2008, 19(9):838-842.
[14] Schneider I K, Rutjens B T, Jostmann N B, et al. Weighty matters: importance literally feels heavy[J]. Soc Psychol Pers Sci, 2011, 2(5):474-478.
[15] Glenberg A M, Robertson D A. Indexical understanding of instructions[J]. Discourse Process, 1999, 28(1):1-26.
[16] Yang T. Image schemas in verb-particle constructions: evidence from a behavioral experiment[J]. J Psycholinguist Res, 2016, 45(2):379-393.
[17] Zwaan R A. The immersed experiencer: toward an embodied theory of language comprehension[J]. Psychol Learn Motiv, 2004, 44:35-62.
[18] Taylor L J, Lev-Ari S, Zwaan R A. Inferences about action engage action systems[J]. Brain Lang, 2008, 107(1):62-67.
[19] Zwaan R A. Processing narrative time shifts[J]. J Exp Psychol Learn, 1996, 22(5):1196.
[20] Hutchinson S, Louwerse M. Language statistics and individual differences in processing primary metaphors[J]. Cogn Linguist, 2013, 24(4):667-687.
[21] Louwerse M. Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition[J]. T Cogn Sci, 2011, 3(2):273-302.
[22] Louwerse M, Hutchinson S. Neurological evidence linguistic processes precede perceptual simulation in conceptual processing[J]. Front Psychol, 2012, 3:385.
[23] 徐倩, 王萍, 施伯瀚, 等. 镜像神经元系统在失语症中的应用进展[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2019, 25(7):771-773.
[24] Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley J B. Brain regions with mirror properties: a meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies[J]. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 2012, 36(1):341-349.
[25] Anderson M L. Précis of after phrenology: neural reuse and the interactive brain[J]. Behav Brain Sci, 2016, 39:e120.
[26] Hickok G. The Myth of Mirror Neurons: The Real Neuroscience of Communication and Cognition [M]. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2014.
[27] Anderlini D, Wallis G, Marinovic W. Language as a predictor of motor recovery: the case for a more global approach to stroke rehabilitation[J]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2019, 33(3):167-178.
[28] Cardona J F. Embodied cognition: a challenging road for clinical neuropsychology[J]. Front Aging Neurosci, 2017, 9:388.
[29] Barsalou L W. On Staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends[J]. Psychon B Rev, 2016, 23(4):1122-1142.
[30] Macedonia M, Mueller K, Friederici A D. The impact of iconic gestures on foreign language word learning and its neural substrate[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2011, 32(6):982-998.
[31] Zettin M, Leopizzi M, Galetto V. How does language change after an intensive treatment on imitation?[J]. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2019, 29(9):1332-1358.
[32] Chen W L, Ye Q, Zhang S C, et al. Aphasia rehabilitation based on mirror neuron theory: a randomized-block-design study of neuropsychology and functional magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Neural Regener Res, 2019, 14(6):1004-1012.
[33] Marangolo P, Bonifazi S, Tomaiuolo F, et al. Improving language without words: first evidence from aphasia[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2010, 48(13):3824-3833.
[34] Snyder G J, Waddell D E, Blanchet P. Mirror neurons as a model for the science and treatment of stuttering[J]. Neuroreport, 2016, 27(1):56-60.
[35] Routhier S, Bier N, Macoir J. Smart tablet for smart self-administered treatment of verb anomia: two single-case studies in aphasia[J]. Aphasiology, 2016, 30(2-3):269-289.
[36] Grechuta K, Rubio Ballester B, Espin Munne R, et al. Augmented dyadic therapy boosts recovery of language function in patients with nonfluent aphasia: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Stroke, 2019, 50(5):1270-1274.
[37] Mower E, Black M P, Flores E, et al. Rachel: design of an emotionally targeted interactive agent for children with autism[C]. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 2011: 1-6.
[38] Wilson A D, Golonka S. Embodied cognition is not what you think it is[J]. Front Psychol, 2013, 4:58.
[39] Rowlands M. Extended cognition and the mark of the cognitive[J]. Philos Psychol, 2009, 22(1):1-19.
[40] Goel L, Johnson N, Junglas I, et al. Situated learning: conceptualization and measurement[J]. Decision Sci J Innov Educ, 2010, 8(1):215-240.
[41] 王会亭. 从“离身”到“具身”:课堂有效教学的“身体”转向[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2015, 35(12):57-63.
[42] 殷明, 刘电芝. 身心融合学习:具身认知及其教育意蕴[J]. 课程·教材·教法, 2015, 35(7):57-65.
[43] 胡洁斯, 李琳. 浅析具身认知理论于设计中的应用[J]. 美术教育研究, 2018(9):81.
[44] Dreyer F R, Pulvermüller F. Abstract semantics in the motor system?–An event-related fMRI study on passive reading of semantic word categories carrying abstract emotional and mental meaning[J]. Cortex, 2018, 100:52-70.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉