Abstract: ObjectiveTo assess the value of Percolse, Angio-Seal vascular closure devices in emergency percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods603 patients undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention were divided into manual compression group (n=160), Perclose group (n=237) and Angio-Seal group (n=206). The time of hemostasis, time of immobilization and the incidence of vascular complications were observed in each group. ResultsThe time of hemostasis, time of immobilization in vascular closure devices groups were significantly shorter than those in manual compression group (P<0.01). The incidence of vascular complications were significantly lower than those in manual compression group (P<0.01). There was no difference between Perclose group and Angio-Seal group (P>0.05). The rate of successful hemostasis was not significantly different among each group (P>0.05). ConclusionThe Perclose and Angio-Seal vascular closure device is safe and reliable hemostasis in emergency percutaneous coronary intervention.

Key words: vascular closure devices, emergency percutaneous coronary intervention, hemostasis, complication