Objective To analyze the status quo and development of the Hope Houses for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Shanghai. Methods In June, 2018, the organizers and managers of Hope Houses from 16 districts in Shanghai were investigated with the self-designed questionnaires, which covered the personal characteristics, knowledge of related policy, development of projects and obstacles, and rehabilitation recognition. The descriptive analysis and correlational analyses were conducted. Results Totally, eleven organizers and 16 managers were investigated. The knowledge of related policy for organizers was not good enough. Eight Hope Houses in 16 districts in Shanghai were operated by social organizations. The average implementation rate of projects in Hope Houses was 60.6%, and the highest was rehabilitation knowledge education (96.3%). There was insufficient provision in legal services, job skills training, rehabilitation nursing guidance, job referral, medical referral and education referral, etc. The main related factors limiting the development of the Hope Houses were lacks of budgets, social consensus and professionals. The rehabilitation cognition of organizers and managers was generally good, but the cognition of rehabilitation principles and rehabilitation value needed to be strengthened. Conclusion The Hope Houses for individuals with SCI in Shanghai work well, and the rehabilitation cognition of organizers and managers is satisfactory. It should be strenghened in resource input, comprehensive rehabilitation and standard of management, to expand the service timely.
XIE Hai-xia
,
YANG Yu-hui
,
WU Ai-rong
,
SHEN Chen
,
HU Long-jun
,
ZHANG Jia
,
LIN Pei-pei
,
CHEN Gang
,
Lü Jun
,
CHANG Feng-shui
. Status Quo and Development of Hope Houses for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury in Shanghai from Perspective of Managers and Organizers[J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice, 2019
, 25(10)
: 1221
-1227
.
DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2019.00.011
1 GrangerC V, KarmarkarA M, GrahamJ E, et al. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury discharged from rehabilitation programs in 2002-2010 [J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2012, 91(4): 289-299.
2 SilvaN A, SousaN, ReisR L, et al. From basics to clinical: a comprehensive review on spinal cord injury [J]. Prog Neurobiol, 2014, 114(1): 25-57.
3 邱卓英,施红梅,马洪卓. 脊髓损伤患者的心理特点及其康复策略[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2002, 24(6): 60-62.
4 杨明亮,李建军,李强,等. 脊柱脊髓损伤临床及康复治疗路径实施方案[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2012, 18(8): 791-796.
5 刘桂新. 康复训练对脊髓损伤患者自理能力的影响[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2008, 24(4): 513.
6 丘卫红，郝元涛，钟兴，等. 脊髓损伤患者康复期生存质量的研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2009, 24(12):1095-1099.
7 翟华. 脊髓损伤伤友“中途之家”社区康复服务模式的尝试[J]. 中国社区医师(医学专业), 2010, 12(32): 253-254.
8 徐凤建. 脊髓损伤者中途之家康复指导手册[M]. 上海:上海科学技术出版社, 2010.
9 禹玲玲. 在这个“家”里可以找到希望——我国脊髓损伤者希望之家(中途之家)发展纪实报道[J]. 中国残疾人, 2017(5): 26-33.
10 林何梅,韦海燕,周享玲. “中途之家”新型社区服务模式在脊髓损伤患者康复中的应用[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2013, 19(16): 1898-1900.
11 上海市残疾人联合会. 上海市阳光康复中心“蒲公英”志愿队国际残疾人日服务纪实[EB/OL]. [2018-10-04]. http://www.shjgdj.gov.cn/web/node212/node213/node365/u1ai24090.html.
12 ChangF S, ZhangQ, SunM, et al. Epidemiological study of spinal cord injury individuals from halfway houses in Shanghai, China [J]. J Spinal Cord Med, 2017, 41(4): 450-458.
13 解海霞,苌凤水,沈雪韵,等. 上海脊髓损伤者“中途之家”机构康复训练效果初步评价[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2018, 33(9): 1087-1091.
14 解海霞,苌凤水,沈沉,等. 脊髓损伤患者机构康复训练效果的影响因素分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2018, 28(6): 529-534.
15 邱卓英,张爱民. 《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》应用指导(一)[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2003, 9(1): 25-39.
16 World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF [M]. Geneva: WHO, 2001.
17 赵悌尊,冯彦侠. 社区康复中的转介服务[J]. 中国康复, 2000, 15(2): 119-121.
18 世界卫生组织. 世界残疾报告[R]. 日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2011.
19 中华人民共和国国务院.残疾预防和残疾人康复条例[EB/OL]. [2019-01-04]. http://www.cdpf.org.cn/zcwj1/flfg/201702/t20170228_583384.shtml.
20 张栩. 脊髓损伤的全面康复(一个高位颈髓损伤骨科医师的康复历程)[C]. 呼和浩特:第一届全国脊髓损伤治疗与康复研讨会暨中国康复医学会脊柱脊髓损伤专业委员会脊髓损伤与康复学组成立会议论文汇编, 2009.
21 李建军,王方永,逯晓蕾. 脊柱脊髓损伤全面康复[C]. 北京:第3届北京国际康复论坛论文集, 2008.
22 崔佳良. 香港残疾人士社会康复服务体系综述[J]. 残疾人研究, 2015(3): 18-22.
23 蒋群花,程惠仙,沈丽,等. 医院-社区-家庭护理模式对脊髓损伤患者康复的影响[J]. 上海护理, 2018, 18(4): 28-31.
24 宗慧燕,何毅,郭华,等. 脊髓损伤社区康复转介模式探索[J]. 华西医学, 2017, 32(3): 404-407.
25 朱平,邱卓英,李建军,等. 脊髓损伤患者康复管理的主要内容与方法[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2005, 11(1): 82.
26 解海霞,王惠芳,翟华. 专业康复机构在推动社区脊髓损伤 “中途之家”共组中的作用探讨[C]. 北京:第9届北京国际康复论坛论文集, 2014.
27 吴爱荣,翟华,施娟,等. 脊髓损伤患者康复期健康教育需求的调查分析与对策[J]. 实用临床护理学电子杂志, 2018, 3(20): 62-63.
28 World Health Organization, the International Spinal Cord Society. International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury [R]. Geneva: WHO, 2013.
